drafted the initial manuscript, revised and finalised the content. After posted here, I contacted the editor and she replied that they received one reviewer's comment but couldn't get any feedback from the second reviewer. I had a similar query, so I'm putting this in the thread. Editors say, "If a manuscript has many English language and editing issues, please do not try and fix it. ]]> Use your Google, Twitter of ORCiD account to get started. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? A full read-through will also make sure that any initial concerns are indeed correct and fair. Hey ,, this happpened to my manuscript just yesterday, what can I expect ? This point is only valid if researchers can point to recent developments in data gathering techniques or to research in indirectly related fields that suggest the topic needs revisiting. From April 1, 2013, RCUK or Wellcome Trust funded authors will be directed to sign the open access agreement under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license in order to be funder compliant . Does it mean my manuscript has a chance to be sent for peer review? Peer reviewers now assess the study and provide their comments. Supplementing with Prof. Mohammad Jakir Hosen. Scholarly interest in the experience of dehumanization, the perception that one is being dehumanized, has increased significantly in recent years, yet the construct lacks a validated measurement. Of course, one cannot be sure, but I think your paper stands a fair chance of being sent for peer review. I know a Nature journal when I see one. Please update if any progress ormore information regarding these journals. Are there certain aspects that could be communicated better, such as parts of the discussion? Why should you use Manuscripts? AAMs should not include other publisher value-added contributions, however, such as formatting, pagination, and copyediting. What is the main question addressed by the research? B. Wiley's Corporate Citizenship initiative Wiley's Corporate Citizenship initiative seeks to address the environmental, social, economic, and . In this manuscript, we review our indications, . 8 Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999 . 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. . I want to publish a paper at the EI-Compendex conference, please suggest a conference with a high acceptance rate. Many journals don't provide criteria for reviews beyond asking for your 'analysis of merits'. Read this article till the end to get answers to all your questions. We believe that peer-review needs to be efficient, rigorous, and fair for everyone involved. Usually, this means it is being discussed amongst several editors for publication or transfer to a sister publication. All Rights Reserved. Galleria Arte Roma Lavora Con Noi, Authors can check the status of . Further instructions will be emailed to you from ScholarOne. I want do online protein databank search for my protein identification and its homology. accept, reject, revise and resubmit, etc.) Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? For example, equipment used or sampling methods should all be described in detail so that others could follow the same steps. It's totally reasonable to send an email to the editor requesting a clarification. If not, what would be required to make their case credible? However, if the status has been showing under consideration for a long time, there is a possibility that the editor is trying to find peer reviewers for the paper. Try to answer all the questions. In such a scenario, the editorial board would send the manuscript to other peer reviewers or assign a different section editor. MDPI operates a rigorous and transparent peer-review process that aims to maximize quality. After the detailed read-through, you will be in a position to advise whether the title, abstract and key words are optimized for search purposes. The manuscript cannot be under consideration by another journal at any time that it is under consideration by JBMR Plus. m.white@us.nature.com To: Paul.Bierman@uvm.edu Reply-To: m.white@us.nature.com Decision on Nature manuscript . Editor's Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Macular folds definition 4 . Agrifood Toscana Fatturato, assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor - there is no separate system status to indicate this). "When the comments seem really positive, but the recommendation is rejectionit puts the editor in a tough position of having to reject a paper when the comments make it sound like a great paper." What can reviewers do to help? Nutrient-exercise timing (acute studies) The acute responses to nutrient-exercise timing have been reviewed for substrate utilisation (Vieira et al. The scope of the journal includes studies of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; cost . Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor's decision. After all research is an incomplete, on-going project by its nature. The manuscript describes the steps carried out to study three rural areas at low, medium and high population density in the UK: a data landscape to select study areas; the development of an activity-based model, which uses anonymised mobile network data (MND) aggregated at trip-chains level to derive travel patterns; and the development of an . I am very new to research and this happens to be my first paper. Where a cited article is central to the author's argument, you should check the accuracy and format of the reference - and bear in mind different subject areas may use citations differently. [CDATA[// >