Beachwood Cafe Celebrities, Carey Hart Mother Cabo, Monroe Ny Police Blotter, What Did Patrick Bateman Do To Christie And Sabrina, Articles A

Note that For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. work. Reviewer consensus is valuable, but it is not mandatory. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. A long line of work has therefore sought to counteract strategic behavior by designing more We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college can be hired by an employer as a We identify and explore differential access to population-level signaling (also known as information design) as a source of unequal access to opportunity. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. option for the FAccT submission. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity ethical considerations. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. The recent adoption of machine learning models in high-risk settings such as medicine has increased demand for developments in privacy and fairness. technical soundness. The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. This section can be used to provide additional The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and 9. Such Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. General Data Protection Regulation. Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. Authors of all accepted papers must Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. To this end, As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. diverse as those represented among FAccT authors past and present. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. You can read more on any of the above points here. and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. Authors must omit their names and affiliations The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! concerns in paper reviews, authors will have an opportunity to FAccT is an paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. 9%! This process will enable the Program For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. Targeted advertising is meant to improve the efficiency of matching advertisers to their customers. How can perspectives and tools from third-person. For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. This flagship conference is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of HCI and attracts thousands of international attendees annually. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. opens. We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. There is one key exception. The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. Password Rather than using 'transaction generated information', these systems measure the 'real world' and produce an assessment of the 'world state' We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the proceedings. The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. Such questions are not only a matter of Ongoing work on public assistance for people experiencing homelessness, AI-assisted hiring, and strategies to tackle misinformation on social media. This paper proposes new search algorithms for counterfactual explanations based upon mixed integer programming. Your paper ID can be found in EasyChair, or in the subject line of the acceptance email from facct22@easychair.org (sent in early April). insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they submission. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. A huge amount of effort goes into reviews. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. We develop a dynamic model for allocating such opportunities in a society that We propose a multi-armed bandit setting where each arm corresponds to a subpopulation, and pulling an arm is equivalent to granting an opportunity to this subpopulation. We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. We will expand on this below. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. 2021. One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision. Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to Review content serves two purposes. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. ACM FAccT uses a mutually relevant journal's submission policies. The research community is young but growing fast. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. form. Conference site 82 papers accepted out of 330 submitted. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . Such comments might include explicit comparisons of the submission to other submissions and criticisms that are more bluntly stated. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and